>FSK’s Guide to Reality (January 24 2010)
President James Garfield, who was murdered in 1881, is hardly ever mentioned in State brainwashing centers (schools).
Here’s some interesting quotes.
“He who controls the money supply of a nation controls the nation”.
“Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce”.
Allegedly, the latter was said during his inauguration speech.
This quote is also interesting.
“The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. Grave doubts have been entertained whether Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender. The present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the necessities of war; but such paper should depend for its value and currency upon its convenience in use and its prompt redemption in coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its compulsory circulation. These notes are not money, but promises to pay money. If the holders demand it, the promise should be kept.”
It seems that James Garfield knew that the financial industry was one big scam. Even in 1881 before the creation of the Federal Reserve, a regulated financial industry was forced to operate under corrupt fractional reserve principles.
That quote makes it sound like James Garfield was planning to issue more Greenbacks, like President Lincoln did to finance the Civil War. The banksters are VERY hostile to credit-based fiat money directly spent into circulation by the government. Such money does not come with debt-strings attached, and helps people escape the chains of debt slavery. In the present, deficit spending is financed by Treasury Bonds, which are owned by the banksters. The only reason the Federal government doesn’t directly spend money into circulation is that contradicts the interests of the banksters.
Even though the banking cartel has a lot of power, they sometimes make a mistake and let someone with a clue become President. James Garfield is an example of such an error. Such mistakes are easily corrected via an assassination. That both eliminates a threat and sends a message to all other politicians, making sure they don’t behave too honestly.
There’s another interesting thing about these “Presidents were assassinated!” conspiracy theories. Lincoln, Garfield, and Kennedy were all hostile to the interests of the banksters, and all three were assassinated. For each of them, the official State explanation was “It was a lone crazy person responsible for the assassination!” rather than “Insiders killed him to protect their interests!” In the “conspiracy talk” surrounding Kennedy’s assassination, people usually debate the mechanics of how Kennedy was killed, rather than “Why was Kennedy killed?”
Some people say that the Secret Service that protects the President is REALLY GOOD. The President could not be assassinated unless his security team allowed it. Allegedly, President Kennedy could not have been killed unless it were an inside job.
I wouldn’t be surprised if some Secret Service agents were also on the payroll of the banksters. The Secret Service doesn’t just protect the President. The Secret Service also spies on the President all the time. The Secret Service helps make sure that the President isn’t exposed to any “dangerous” ideas.
If you’re one of the insiders working for the banking cartel, it isn’t too hard to hire someone to conduct an assassination, and then deny any connection to the banksters.
Given James Garfield’s opposition to the banksters, it’s not a surprise that he is not discussed at all in school.
Bill Totten http://www.ashisuto.co.jp/english/index.html