Home > Uncategorized > Any Way You Calculate it …

Any Way You Calculate it …

… Income Inequality is Getting Worse

by Pete Dolack

CounterPunch (December 30 2016)

A flurry of new reports have provided yet more data demonstrating that inequality is getting worse. All right, this does not qualify as a shock. But it really isn’t your imagination.

The economic crisis, nearly a decade on now, has been global in scope – working people most everywhere continue to suffer while the one percent are doing just fine. One measure of this is wages. A newly released report {1} by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) finds that median wages in the OECD’s 35 member countries are still below where they were in 2007. For the bottom ten percent of wage earners, the news is worse; wages for this bottom decile have declined 3.6 percent since 2007. But wages have risen for the top ten percent.

The report on wage inequality by the OECD, the club of the world’s advanced capitalist countries and a few of the biggest developing countries, also found that inequality has increased in most of those countries. No part of the world has been immune. The report, “Income inequality remains high in the face of weak recovery”, states:

 

 

The crisis has not only heavily affected the number of jobs but also their quality … Even in countries where labour market slack has been re-absorbed, low-quality jobs and high disparities among workers in terms of work contracts or job security weigh heavily on low-earning households and contribute to maintaining high levels of income inequality. Wages have stalled in most countries, including those that were largely spared by the recession (for example, Japan) and fallen in those hard hit (e.g. Greece, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom). {2}

 

 

Chile and Mexico are the most unequal countries among the OECD members, followed by the United States, as measured by the gini coefficient. Iceland, Norway and Denmark are the least unequal. (The gini coefficient, the standard statistical measure of income distribution, is equal to zero if everybody has the same income and to one if a single person takes all income.) To put that scale into some tangible form, Iceland’s gini coefficient is 0.24 and Chile’s is 0.46.

Global Inequality Worse than any Country’s

The world’s most unequal country {3} is South Africa at 0.65. Calculating this scale on a global basis gives a better idea of the scale of inequality but is a difficult statistic to find. One measure, as calculated for a United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization paper {4}, estimates the world gini coefficient in 2005 was 0.68, significantly higher than in the nineteenth century but a bit lower than it had been in 1981. That’s higher than South Africa. The Economist, crunching data from several sources, estimates a global gini coefficient of 0.65 in 2008, a very slight dip from the 1980s peak.

Global inequality has very likely worsened since but no more recent statistics appear to be available.

Rising inequality has been particularly acute in the global center of world capitalism, the United States, and a quick examination of trends there are useful as capitalists elsewhere seek to emulate the new US gilded age. Those at the top of the pyramid are grabbing ever more. The Economist reports:

 

 

Including capital gains, the share of national income going to the richest one percent of Americans has doubled since 1980, from ten percent to twenty percent, roughly where it was a century ago. Even more striking, the share going to the top 0.01% – some 16,000 families with an average income of $24 million – has quadrupled, from just over one percent to almost five percent. That is a bigger slice of the national pie than the top 0.01% received 100 years ago.

Another new study, by economists Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman {6}, found that the average pre-tax income of the bottom fifty percent of US adults is flat since 1980 in inflation-adjusted dollars – and this includes government transfers, other public spending and the value of job-derived fringe benefits – and thus the share of national income going to the bottom half of United Statesians declined to twelve percent in 2014 from twenty percent in 1980. The top one percent, meanwhile, hauled in twenty percent of income in 2014. Another way of looking at this inequality, the authors write, is that the top one percent of US adults earned on average 81 times more than an adult in the bottom fifty percent. This ratio was 27 times in 1980.

The Top of the Pyramid Does Well Around the World

To zero in on the tip of the pyramid, the US Internal Revenue Service released a report this month on the 400 tax returns showing the highest incomes reported to it. Those 400 taxpayers reported an aggregate income of $127 billion in 2014 – a fourfold increase in inflation-adjusted dollars since 1980. Those 400 taxpayers by themselves accounted for six percent of all interest income and eleven percent of all capital gains (profits from financial assets such as stocks and bonds). To put that in perspective, 149 million tax returns were filed in the US in 2014. Stock-market bubbles and other forms of financial speculation truly are the province of the super-wealthy.

In Canada, Statistics Canada reports that, in 2013, the top one percent grabbed 10.3 percent of income; the average Canadian in this grouping received $450,000 that year. In Britain, the top one percent have doubled their income since 2005, collectively adding another GBP 250 billion to their wealth. Meanwhile, a fifth of Britons live below the poverty line and life expectancy in some areas is lower than in many developing countries, The Independent reports. Australian inequality has not yet reached the above levels, but is getting wider – the percentage of total Australian income grabbed by the top 0.1 percent there has more than doubled since 1980.

Again, nothing here is going to make you fall off your chair in shock. The question becomes: What will we do about all this? This is the internally logical result of the development of capitalism – the upward distribution of income as exploitation accelerates through work speedups, layoffs, movement of production to low-wage havens and the panoply of deregulatory measures resulting from corporate capture of governments.

So-called “free trade” agreements, with their use of clauses enabling multi-national corporations to use secret private tribunals controlled by their lawyers to overturn laws they don’t like, are an exemplary example of the processes used to ratchet up inequality, even if but one of many manifestations. Capital is international and our resistance to it must be international as well. The rise of far right and even fascist movements across Europe and in the United States, decked in the cloaks of nationalism and fake populism, is all the more dangerous because the scapegoating that is always front and center in such movements deflects attention from the real problems.

If the beginning of the end of capitalism is upon us – admittedly something that none of us can yet be certain of – then the need to build movements that can move societies toward a better world is all the more a necessity. Even if the final decay of capitalism has arrived, that decay is likely to unfold over decades unless a global Left movement, uniting the variety of social and environmental movements and struggles across borders, can speed up the process. The only alternative is for inequality to get worse and the repression necessary to impose that inequality to get still more severe.

Links:

{1} http://www.oecd.org/social/OECD2016-Income-Inequality-Update.pdf

{2} http://www.oecd.org/social/OECD2016-Income-Inequality-Update.pdf#2

{3} https://systemicdisorder.wordpress.com/2015/08/18/marikana-massacre-anniversary/

{4} ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/ak968e/ak968e00.pdf#2

{5} http://www.economist.com/node/21564414

{6} http://gabriel-zucman.eu/files/PSZ2016.pdf

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/12/30/any-way-you-calculate-it-income-inequality-is-getting-worse/

Advertisements
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: